| Join Our List
|
|
|
|
Dear Sacha,
The
times still change quickly. We're no longer in the days of
hearing about a faster computer processor or incredible software
break-throughs every three or six months, but the changes are still
there. Because some of these changes are so quiet we have to be
all the more vigilant. Otherwise, we might end up being behind by
months or even years. The debate between installed software and
on-demand is a good example of how old truths can blind us to the
future.
|
| On-demand vs Installed Software |
|
| Where the real differences lie
There
used to be no question that installed software - specifically
enterprise resource planning software - was head and shoulders above
anything an application service provider could offer. The high
cost of ERP solutions was justified by what the software could do, or
at least that was the idea. The thinking used to be that only
large companies needed ERPs; this was convenient, since they were the
only ones who could afford them.
Since then a number of things
have changed. ERPs are not as elegant a solution as everyone had
hoped. In fact, installing one could prove to be a gamble on just
how much it cost and how well it worked. Would it save millions
or cost millions more than planned? Would it be ready in six
months or would bugs still be worked out in six years? The
ASP concept has matured into the software-as-a-service (or on-demand)
model. Utility that was once only available by purchasing the
software and installing it on as many computers as needed is now
available with a single service contract. For the cost of
buying a single copy of some software packages you can now have your
entire office work with that software for a year.
Offering
smaller, simpler software applications on-demand is easy enough.
It seems like common sense to think that providing something that can
match an ERP must be something else, entirely. That, too, is
yesterday's common sense. Today on-demand software can offer
feature and functionality parity with enterprise solutions.
The obvious benefit? Companies are able to adopt these solutions
without going through a lengthy and costly on-premises deployment
exercise.
The question has boiled down to, "Your computer or
mine?" Today, with properly developed software-as-a-service
solutions like the ElectronicTendering System, it doesn't matter who's
computer runs the software. The beauty of SaaS and products like
the ETS is that it will do its job for you without the smallest
application being installed on your computers. Installing a
computer network, or updating it, or making certain all your computers,
peripherals, and existing software are compatible with the new ERP are
headaches of the past.
ERP does have its advantages and larger
companies or government departments who can afford traditional
installed software may still opt for them. SaaS is not the answer
for them. However, it is the answer for small or medium sized
departments who were once locked out of updating how they work because
they didn't have the means to adopt an installed software
approach. If you've given up a software solution as being too
expensive for you, look again. Even if it isn't available
on-demand yet, that may change sooner than you think.
|
| Resources |
|
How "green" are you really?
Here's an interesting tool that will help you determine just how green your office really is. With the Xerox Sustainability Calculator you can track where your office is doing well and where improvements are still possible.
|
|
If
you're having trouble deciding between installed software and
on-demand, give on-demand a try first. Do this especially if the
ERP you're looking at has an on-demand version. Even if the
on-demand version can't yet do everything the installed software can
do, you'll get an excellent look at what it is you may be buying.
Sincerely,
Sacha Hartmann
YSER Inc.
|
|
|