YNL Logo
YSER Newsletter
Your e-Procurement Community
In This Issue
Step by Step
Quick Links
Join Our List
Join Our Mailing List
Issue: 9 October/2007
Dear Sacha,

I have an easier time working with something new when I'm introduced to it in stages.  I can get used to it and once I learn the ground rules I can even anticipate what might come next.  I wouldn't expect anyone to go from using a typewriter one week to printing documents with Microsoft Office 2003 the next.  The same holds true for an e-government product, no matter how user friendly it is.  Following a methodical progression when introducing a new way of working yields better results than jumping straight to the finish line.
Step by Step
A measured approach

The ElectronicTender System is a complete e-procurement solution, so it is natural to ask, "Why should we not use the e-bid module?"  To put the question another way, why approach e-procurement in stages?  The answer involves to factors: the first is change and the second is electronic bidding itself.

It is no secret that introducing change to a department is a challenge and can quickly lead to unforseen problems.  This is the principle behind making the ETS available without the e-bid component.  By introducing the ElectronicTender System, and thus change, at a controlled pace the affected people can adapt to the new situation.  They will be able to work with the change rather then being overwhelmed by it.

The reservation with this scenario is that with a step by step introduction the workload will initially increase, rather than decrease.  The department will have to continue its normal work as well as familiarizing itself with an online system.  This is true initially.  Change requires additional work.  The reason to go through with it is that once the transition is complete, the full benefits will be available to you.

The chaos that can be caused by change is not one-sided.  Any such change that a procurement department introduces necessarily has an impact on its suppliers.  Even if you, as a buyer, are completely prepared with your e-procurement product it may be a shock for your suppliers.  This is particularly true if the e-bid aspect is more advanced than simply e-mailing the required documents.

More importantly, there is an important difference between receiving and accepting electronic bids.  Using the ETS's full capabilities will allow you to receive e-bids, accepting them in a legal sense is another matter altogether.  It is this latter that we have frequently encountered as a stumbling block to the implementation of an e-procurement system.  This is, and remains, the most tangible hurdle.

It is all the more challenging to overcome this setback because it does not lie with the department to make the change to being able to accept e-bids.  This is another situation where introducing the ETS in stages can prove beneficial.  This holds true whether it involves convincing a group of individuals or a change to existing laws.

In some cases the Board of Commissioners is the final word on whether the change to accepting e-bids goes through or not.  It is only natural for them to have the same reservations about introducing change as anyone else.  If they can see for themselves that the ETS provides the promised benefits, accepting the switch to an e-procurement system will not require a leap of faith from the commissioners.

For others, accepting electronic bids requires certain laws to be in place.  The argument here runs in a similar direction.  If the procurement department is not in a position to accept electronic bids, nor even explores the possibility, there is precious little pressure to change existing laws.  At the least, with a system in place that can quickly lead to accepting electronic bids, there is reason for the laws to be changed.

There is certainly one other aspect that cannot be overlooked.  While it may take some work to push for going online, the decisions to do so may come without any such effort.  If the decision fails to take full advantage of what e-procurement can provide, and you have already taken steps to introduce your department to this eventuality, you will not find yourself in the position of playing catch-up.
Change is work.  The best we can hope for is to minimize the negative impact it has on us during the transition.  While it may not be possible for you take advantage of the full strength of what the ETS offers, if you take the first steps now the steps which remain will be much less work.

It is when we try to do everything at once that we are overwhelmed.  To avoid this we need to approach a task this large in a way that allows us to maintain an overview.
 
Sincerely,
 

Sacha Hartmann
YSER Inc.
This email was sent to shar@yserinc.com, by shar@yserinc.com
YSER Inc. | Delaware Technology Park | 1 Innovation Way | Suite 301 | Newark | DE | 19711